The inspector general of the federal Department of Health and Human Services conducts a handful of performance reviews of state Medicaid fraud prosecution units each year, but the office had not been planning such a review in New York.
In July, however, three lawmakers - John E. Sweeney, a Republican congressman from upstate New York; Ralph Regula, a Republican congressman from Ohio; and State Senator Dean G. Skelos, a Nassau County Republican who is the Senate's deputy majority leader - called on the inspector general's office to look into how New York has used federal money for Medicaid fraud detection and prosecution.
They cited articles published in The New York Times in July that showed that losses in the program because of fraud could potentially be in the billions of dollars and that the state's fraud prevention efforts had been ineffectual. Clearly, they said, something needed to be done.
"We can't address the cost of Medicaid and what funding level is appropriate until we understand the fraud issue," said Melissa Carlson, a spokeswoman for Mr. Sweeney.
The state fraud unit reports to Attorney General Eliot Spitzer. Federal officials made clear that the review, which will probably be conducted in October, is not a full-scale audit. It will examine the unit's compliance in areas like annual training, staffing levels and case management. A final report will then be issued, probably early next year.
The Times articles focused largely on the State Department of Health, which runs Medicaid in New York and is primarily responsible for fraud detection. The department, which reports to Gov. George E. Pataki, is then supposed to refer potential cases to the Medicaid fraud control unit for prosecution.
But the articles also showed that the prosecution unit has fallen behind fraud control units in other large states in the amount of money recovered from fraud prosecutions as a percentage of the state's overall Medicaid budget.
Darren Dopp, a spokesman for Mr. Spitzer, said yesterday that his office welcomed the review, which he hoped would highlight the need for more case referrals from the Health Department, an issue highlighted in the Times's series.
Last year, the department referred just 37 cases to the attorney general's office, far fewer than the number referred by similar agencies to Medicaid fraud prosecutors in any other large state.
"We think that any review will show we're doing the right things," Mr. Dopp said.
Mr. Sweeney and Mr. Skelos had initially hoped that the inspector general's office would also look into the Health Department's anti-fraud efforts, as both offices receive substantial federal money for Medicaid fraud prevention.
But oversight of the Health Department's performance in this area rests with the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, not the inspector general's office, officials said yesterday.