Home My Business About Me My Book My Photos
My Poems My Documentaries My Newspaper Articles News To Know  My Links
MySpace My Guestbook      

 

Things that are going on that you might want to know. 

 

66

 

Katrina's Impact on the Disability Community:

Immediate Needs and Long Term Consequences Resulting from Inadequate
Government Policy

Compiled by ADAPT

Immediate impact on survivors with disabilities;

While nursing homes and other institutional settings were an understandable
evacuation alternative as a first response, they are no more appropriate for
the long term than are the shelters like the Astrodome. Both need to be
short term so people can resume/rebuild lives in the community as quickly as
possible.

In the evacuation process, people with disabilities were separated from
their wheelchairs and walkers, canes and service dogs, caretakers and family
members. As a result many people ended up being sent to nursing homes
because they were perceived to need more assistance than they typically do.
It is imperative to reunite people with family members and caregivers and
service animals, and to replace their assistive equipment so they can
resume/rebuild their lives in the community as quickly as possible.

People with disabilities have been grossly undercounted and unnoticed
because many bypassed shelters when they were immediately sent to nursing
homes, institutions and/or hospitals. These institutional settings,
especially those spread across the country, are not being served by the FEMA
Super Service Centers. It is imperative that an accurate accounting occur to
identify all the people with disabilities of all ages who were temporarily
sent to nursing homes in Louisiana and many other states, and that an
inventory of their needs be compiled.

Service coordination and brokering is essential to bridge the gap between
the persons with disabilities rendered homeless by Katrina and the
accessible homes, transportation, services and supports they need to
resume/rebuild their lives in the community as quickly as possible. Centers
for Independent Living, local Arcs and People First groups, and other
community-based disability organizations are experts on people with
disabilities and their service and support needs. Funding them to provide
service coordination/brokering for Katrina survivors would be cost
effective, provide competent, knowledgeable assistance, and prevent the need
to "re-invent the wheel."

Longer term impact on entire national disability community;

The needs, services and supports of poor people with disabilities must not
be pitted against the needs, services and supports of the Katrina survivors.
Policy formulated to assist survivors of Katrina should not provide a
stop-gap bandaid solution to a gaping wound in the current disability
service system. Reforming the system to heal the wound for ALL Americans
will prevent the need for similar stop-gap initiatives in the future. People
with disabilities and other poor people have been waiting for as long as 10
years in some states for affordable accessible HUD subsidized housing. Over
and over, they have been told "there is no housing."

In the aftermath of Katrina, great stocks of affordable/HUD subsidized
housing suddenly materialized. Like those who, thankfully, survived Katrina,
poor people with disabilities also need homes, and want to end their
homelessness. HUD, Congress and the President must find ways to help Katrina
survivors that don't decimate the already critical lack of resources
available to poor people with disabilities.

Legislation just proposed in the Senate provides that the Medicaid dollars
paying for disabled Katrina survivors in nursing homes and institutions
would follow them, assisting them to return to their former or new
communities, and not be forced to remain in the nursing homes and other
institutions. This enlightened common-sense solution should be available to
ALL persons with disabilities, being exactly what people with disabilities
have been advocating for the past 25 years. In addition, when this
legislation passes, it should assure that people with disabilities in the
states, who have again been waiting for years for funding that will allow
them to return to or remain in their own homes and communities, will not be
pushed to the back of the line by the Katrina survivors in need. As hard and
tirelessly as FEMA and the Red Cross worked in this unprecedented national
disaster, Katrina exposed the frightening lack of knowledge and experience
of both agencies when it comes to p eople
with disabilities, the systems that serve them, and the critical need for
service co-ordination/brokering in order to assure that people with
disabilities are not left behind to die, or left unserved when the crisis is
over. Comprehensive and long-term planning efforts must be adequately funded
and need to meaningfully involve people with disabilities so that the result
will be an expert national network that can mobilize immediately to see to
the very particular and specific needs of persons with disabilities in
disaster situations. In order to assure quality outcomes, the federal
government must invest in a quality process.




Hurricane Katrina: Its Impact on People with Disabilities
Basic Info on People with Disabilities in Hurricane Katrina Affected Areas
National Council on Disability, September 2, 2005

People with disabilities in the Gulf Coast areas of Alabama, Mississippi,
and Louisiana are experiencing tremendous loss of life and devastation
caused by Hurricane Katrina. Current data indicates that people with
disabilities are now most at risk in this situation-and will need recovery
assistance for months or years. A disproportionate number of the Hurricane
survivors are people with disabilities whose needs for basic necessities are
compounded by chronic health conditions and functional impairments.

For example:

  a.. In Biloxi, Mississippi, a city of about 50,000 people, 26 percent of
residents are people with disabilities. This means that there are 10,700
people with disabilities 5 years of age and older who live in Biloxi.

  b.. In Mobile, Alabama, a city of 198,915 people, 24 percent of the
residents are people with disabilities. This means that there are 43,000
people with disabilities 5 years of age and older who live in Mobile.

  c.. In New Orleans, a city of about 484,000 people, 23.2 percent of
residents are people with disabilities. This means that there are 102,122
people with disabilities 5 years of age and older who live in New Orleans.
Who are the 102,122 people with disabilities who live in New Orleans? About
10 percent (or 12,000) of them are people ages 5 to 20 years old; 61 percent
(or 63,000) of them are aged 21 to 64 years old; and 29 percent (or 27,000)
of the people are 65 years of age and older.
The 102,122 people with disabilities living in New Orleans include people
who are blind, people who are deaf, people who use wheelchairs, canes,
walkers, crutches, people with service animals, and people with mental
health needs. At least half of the people with disabilities in New Orleans
who are of working age are not employed. Many of the people rely on a
variety of government programs such as Supplemental Security Income and
Medicaid to help them meet their daily service and support needs.

Implications: The total destruction of the physical environment and
public/private infrastructure and communications systems in the Gulf Coastal
areas affected by Hurricane Katrina has life-threatening implications for
all citizens with disabilities, and those without disabilities. The
implications for these people include:

  a.. for people with physical disabilities and who are over 65 years of
age, being unable to leave their homes, group homes, nursing homes,
hospitals without significant assistance;

  b.. for all people with disabilities, being prevented from using any type
of accessible public transportation which in all likelihood do not exist
anymore;

  c.. for people who are blind, being unable to even get around in their own
flooded neighborhoods because they can no longer navigate the environmental
landscape;

  d.. for all people with disabilities driven by floods from institutions or
group homes or nursing homes, needing to be housed in less than satisfactory
conditions with considerably less than the necessary range of services and
supports they need for an indeterminate amount of time;

  e.. for people with disabilities who have service animals, are unable to
rely on those animals outside of the house or group home because these
animals cannot navigate safely in the flooded streets;

  f.. for people who are deaf, being challenged to access emergency
information through television, radio, TTY, etc. because public
communications systems are somewhat compromised;

  g.. for all people with disabilities, being unable to secure life-saving
food and water because many of them are trapped within the confines of
inadequate supplied shelters, stadiums, etc.; and

  h.. people may have lost or become separated from the drugs they rely on
daily for diabetes, heart disease and other chronic ailments. Pharmacies in
the affected areas may have insufficient stocks of vital drugs like insulin
for diabetics, creating a need to organize efforts to import and distribute
essential medicines in the area. In addition, many pharmacies have been
raided by looters.
National Council on Disability Calls for Federal Disability Recovery Plan in
Response to Hurricane Katrina
 

 

67

 

MEDICARE DRUG PLANS UNVEILED AS CONGRESS PROPOSES DELAYS AND CHANGES

 

            The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) announced the companies offering Medicare drug plans for 2006.

            At least 11 companies will offer stand-alone prescription drug plans in some regions, and as many as 20 will do so in large states like Texas and New York. Each insurer may offer as many as three different coverage options—for a maximum number of stand-alone plan options between 33 and 60.

            Prescription drug coverage will also be offered through Medicare Advantage plans—private HMOs and PPOs. Because of heavy government subsidies encouraging insurer participation, these Medicare Advantage companies are offering a number of zero premium plans that are likely to catch consumer attention, according to Congressional Quarterly.

            Industry insiders predict that while many premiums are priced low for 2006 to attract consumers, there will be a price jump for 2007 and fewer plans. Industry experts worry that Medicare spending will top Congress’ list of programs to trim in upcoming years, making the Medicare market less attractive for insurers.

            Some fiscally conservative Republicans are recommending delaying the Medicare drug benefit until 2007 to offset Hurricane Katrina relief. According to the Republican Study Committee, delaying the drug benefit for one year would save an estimated $30.8 billion.

            Representatives Pete Stark, Democrat of California, and Jan Schakowsky, Democrat of Illinois, introduced legislation which includes delaying the Medicare drug enrollment penalties giving people with Medicare until December 31, 2006, to enroll in the drug benefit before being slapped with a late-enrollment penalty.

 

68

 

 

Three MILLION PEOPLE APPLY FOR EXTRA HELP

 

            The Social Security Administration (SSA) sent out 18.6 million applications for extra help paying for the Medicare prescription drug benefit from May to August, but only three million applications have been returned.

            The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Administrator Mark McClellan said that CMS actuaries project that 4.6 million people will enroll in the extra help by 2006. Government officials estimate that about 15 million people qualify for the program, half of whom will be automatically enrolled through Medicaid or another government assistance program.

            Social Security Commissioner Jo Anne Barnhart said that SSA’s work is “far from over.” SSA is now making follow-up contacts with those who submitted incomplete applications and those who did not submit an application.

            While government officials praised the initial results, consumer advocates expressed a more guarded view. One group pointed out that the number of applications is meaningless because how many apply is “irrelevant to how many who get assistance.”

 

 

69

 

From Medicaid’s to Medicare’s Prescription Drug Coverage: Dual-Eligibles Face Significant Transition Issues

The transition from Medicaid prescription drug coverage to the new Medicare prescription drug coverage is considered the most significant change to Medicaid policy in past 30 years.  In this transition, families of dual-eligibles with disabilities, caregivers, advocates and providers will be required to educate themselves on the new Medicare coverage (known as Medicare Part D) to ensure that dual-eligibles continue to have affordable access to the prescription drugs they need. 

On December 31, 2005, Medicaid prescription drug coverage for 6.4 million dual-eligibles (those who receive both Medicare and Medicaid) will end and be replaced on January 1, 2006 by the new Medicare Part D coverage, which will be provided by private prescription drug plans (called PDPs). It is estimated that 50 percent of individuals with developmental disabilities, who receive state MR/DD services, are dual-eligibles and will be affected by this transition.  A substantial portion of this population has significant disabilities and complex health needs requiring several prescription medications.   

The Arc and United Cerebral Palsy are preparing extensive public education documents, including comprehensive “Questions and Answers” for families, providers, caregivers, advocates and individuals with disabilities.  Materials, including PowerPoint presentations, and links to important resources will be posted on both organizations Web sites in September.  This information will be updated in October when the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) releases information on the private plans that will be offering Part D coverage.  The new Medicare Prescription Drug and Modernization Act (known as the MMA) allows prescription drug plans to begin marketing to Medicare beneficiaries on October 1. 

The Arc and United Cerebral Palsy strongly advise all dual-eligibles, their families, caregivers and providers to read the CMS material, when it becomes available (via the mail in late October/early November), and the information on The Arc’s and UCP’s Web sites before responding to any marketing information from the private plans.

There are several key differences between Medicaid prescription drug coverage and the new Medicare Prescription Drug Plans (PDPs). For example:

  • The private Prescription Drug Plans may have limited formularies or they may place other restrictions on access to the medications a beneficiary needs.
  • Cost-sharing likely will be higher (except for individuals who live in intermediate care facilities for people with mental retardation (ICF/MRs) or related conditions).
  • Unlike Medicaid, there is no requirement to dispense an emergency supply of medications pending an appeal in a case where a plan seeks to deny coverage for a specific drug (except for individuals who live in an ICF/MR).
  • Unlike Medicaid, pharmacists are permitted to deny medications if beneficiaries are unable to pay the co-pays.

Current Medicaid rules limit these potentially harmful actions that can disrupt treatments and put the health of dual-eligibles at risk, but the Medicaid rules will not apply to dual-eligibles when they transition to Medicare prescription drug coverage.

It is estimated that there will be several (perhaps as many as 20 in some regions) authorized Medicare prescription drug plans in each region of the country. In evaluating which plan meets the needs of dual-eligibles with developmental disabilities, individuals, providers, families and caregivers will be required to consider several factors including:

  • Individuals or their caregivers will need to evaluate the drug formularies (a list of prescription medications that a drug plan will pay for) of the various plans to see if they include all the drugs they need, and to see if there are any restrictions on access to those drugs.
  • If the plans do not cover all their prescription drugs, a medical consultation may be necessary to see if their doctor will work with the person to appeal the decision or if the individual can safely be switched to other medications.
  • They will need to look at the pharmacy network to make sure the pharmacy they use is part of the PDP’s network.
  • Individuals or their caregivers need to be aware that Medicare will reimburse only for premiums that are at or below a certain cost level so choosing another plan may result in higher costs to the individual.

Under Medicare Part D, different rules apply for individuals who reside in nursing facilities or ICF/MRs versus other group homes, at home or in supported living arrangements.  A dual-eligible residing in an ICF/MR or nursing facility will not be required to pay co-pays.  If the dual-eligible’s income is under 100 percent of the federal poverty level ($9,570 annually for an individual), he or she must pay $1 for preferred (usually generic) medications or $3 for non-preferred (usually brand name) medications as described by the PDP.  If the individual’s annual income is above 100 percent of the federal poverty level ($9,570 annually), then the co-pay is $2 for the preferred medication and $5 for the non-preferred.

Dual-eligibles, their families, caregivers, providers and other Medicare beneficiaries are encouraged to call 1-800-MEDICARE and visit the CMS website (http://www.medicare.gov/) for more information. CMS is developing an innovative Internet tool called the “Medicare Prescription Drug Finder” to assist individuals with information and enrollment in the plans. This tool will be unveiled on October 13.  Other resources include:

 

 

70

 



...and I thought people at Harvard were supposed to be smart!



This just shows you that we have a long way to go in establishing good emergency evacuation plans for people with disabilities in NYC, around the State, the Nation, and the World!


College's Exit Plan Debated
By APRIL WANG
Published on Tuesday, October 04, 2005

An e-mail sent last week by the Harvard Accessible Education Office (AEO) detailing emergency evacuation procedures for students with disabilities on campus has sparked concern and confusion about the fairness of evacuation plans for disabled students.

The safety plan specifically states that people near disabled students should not assist them with evacuation in an emergency.

"Do NOT attempt to evacuate or move a student with a disability yourself," the policy states. It also explicitly forbids the use of elevators for all students.

Joseph A. Ford '06, a Currier House resident with cerebral palsy, described the procedures as the "Leave Them Alone to Burn" plan.

"In an emergency situation you can't really predict how long it will take [for assistance to arrive]," said Ford, who responded to the e-mail-which was sent only to proctors and students with disabilities-by sending an e-mail of his own over House and other open-lists. "People are supposed to leave the building as quickly as possible because you don't know what's going on."

Ford says he is familiar with these types of rules because in his high school in Colorado he was left out of practice emergency drills, including bomb drills.

But according to the AEO, in the event of an emergency, disabled students may attempt to evacuate the building themselves.

Ford wrote that this may not always be possible.

"Although I myself can evacuate from my room, I would not be able to evacuate from many classrooms or other venues in the University," Ford wrote. "I believe that this is deeply immoral and illustrates incredible bias."

Ford also pointed out that while students cannot help disabled people, they can assist someone who is intoxicated.

But Scott S. Farmer '09, a fourth-floor resident of Thayer, said he understands why the AEO discourages certain assistance.

"I can see a reason behind [the AEO] saying that, because...in some disability cases, if you do not know how to care for the person, it could actually hurt the person more by helping them than not," Farmer said.

Farmer, who also received the e-mail from AEO, was born with Klippel Trenaunay Weber Syndrome and wears a prosthesis on his left leg. But he said he would be capable of evacuating in the case of an emergency.

"My disability does not warrant the necessity of an elevator, and I would be able to escape the situation," said  Farmer. Although he often travels with a cane or on an electronic scooter, Farmer is capable of moving free of assistance.

The evacuation plan specifically states that the rules regarding assistance should be applied even to students with scooters and wheelchairs.

In case of fire or smoke, the plan states that if students are unable to evacuate, they should try to close their doors and stop cracks with towels. Disabled students may also use their phones to call the Operations Center to confirm their location and the type of assistance that they need. After making the call, the disabled student should then stay in the room and wait for someone from the Operations Center to arrive and assist them.

The AEO is providing each disabled student with stickers bearing the Operations Center number to place onto their phones.

Rules or no rules, Farmer's roommate, John D. Selig '09, said he would not leave Farmer alone in emergency evacuation situation.

"If it ever came down to it, I would totally help my roommate or anyone regardless of what the rules say as long as it was within my power to do so," Selig said.


Help build the Network in 2005-2006, and increase civic participation of people with disabilities in NYC. Get your friends and associates involved. Visit www.dnnyc.net for more info, to join or renew membership, or call 212-251-4071 (Alexander Wood) or 212-251-4092 (Lawrence Carter-Long).

 

 

 

 

Page

 

[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]

[11] [12] [13] [14] [15] [16] [17] [18]

[19] [20] [21] [22] [23] [24] [25] [26]

[27] [28] [29] [30] [31]

 

 

News Page

 

 

 

 Home                                                                                            Back to Top

 

 

1/02/2006  mjg  Ó2003 carmelo gonzalez    webmaster@carmelogonzalez.com   www.CarmeloGonzalez.com

Last updated on 07/19/2008