Home | My Business | About Me | My Book | My Photos |
My Poems | My Documentaries | My Newspaper Articles | News To Know | My Links |
MySpace | My Guestbook |
Things that are going on that you might want to know. |
125 |
"CSI" Actor Brings Disability Awareness to Milwaukee
Each Thursday at 8 p.m., millions of viewers tune in to watch the CBS drama “CSI: Crime Scene Investigation.” Among the notable characters on this ensemble show is the coroner, Dr. Albert Robbins, who stands out both for his dignified matter and because of his pronounced limp. What few viewers know is that the limp is real - actor Robert David Hall has prosthetic legs. Hall, who is also an N.O.D. Board Member, will be in Milwaukee to raise awareness for people with disabilities at the Independence First Power Lunch. ----------------------------------------- Blind Inventor Makes Web AccessibleIn the United Kingdom, inventor Chris Mairs has developed a new device that will make internet content available for people who are blind, and who are not computer literate. Unlike screen readers, the new device will not require people to understand the design of web pages in order to access them. Content will be available, rather, through a one-dimensional audio stream that will operate more like a radio or a tape player. "Seeing Machine" Offers Legally Blind a View of WorldA legally blind poet at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology,. has designed a “seeing machine” that allows people with limited vision to see faces of friends, read or study the layouts of buildings they intend to visit. The device, which M.I.T. estimates costs about $4.000 to manufacture, uses light-emitting diodes to project images onto a person’s eye.
|
126 |
False Dilemma On Stem Cells
By Michael
Kinsley
The issue of stem cell research -- which is back before the Senate -- is often described as a moral dilemma, but it simply is not. Or at least it is not the moral dilemma often used in media shorthand: the rights of the unborn vs. the needs of people suffering from diseases that embryonic stem cells might cure. As one of those people myself (I have Parkinson's), I am not an objective analyst of what the U.S. government's continuing near-ban on stem cell research is costing our society and the world. Naturally, I think it's costing too much. No other potential therapy -- including adult stem cells -- is nearly as promising for my ailment and others. Evaluate that as you wish. Against this, you have the fact that embryonic stem cells are extracted from human embryos, killing the latter in the process. If you believe that embryos a few days after conception have the same human rights as you or me, killing innocent embryos is obviously intolerable. But do opponents of stem cell research really believe that? Stem cell research tests that belief, and sharpens the basic right-to-life question, in a way abortion never has. Here's why. Stem cells used in medical research generally come from fertility clinics, which produce more embryos than they can use. This isn't an accident -- it is essential to their mission of helping people have babies. Often these are "test tube babies": the product of an egg fertilized in the lab and then implanted in a womb to develop until birth. Controversy about test-tube babies has all but disappeared. Vague science-fiction alarms have been crushed by the practical evidence, and potential political backlash, of grateful, happy parents. In any particular case, fertility clinics try to produce more embryos than they intend to implant. Then -- like the Yale admissions office (only more accurately) -- they pick and choose among the candidates, looking for qualities that make for a better human being. If you don't get into Yale, you have the choice of attending a different college. If the fertility clinic rejects you, you get flushed away -- or maybe frozen until the day you can be discarded without controversy. And fate isn't much kinder to the embryos that make this first cut. Usually several of them are implanted in the hope that one will survive. Or, to put it another way, in the hope that all but one will not survive. And fertility doctors do their ruthless best to make these hopes come true. In short, if embryos are human beings with full human rights, fertility clinics are death camps -- with a side order of cold-blooded eugenics. No one who truly believes in the humanity of embryos could possibly think otherwise. And, by the way, when it comes to respecting the human dignity of microscopic embryos, nature -- or God -- is as cavalier as the most godless fertility clinic. The casual creation and destruction of embryos in normal human reproduction is one reason some people, including me, find it hard to make the necessary leap of faith to believe that an embryo and, say, Nelson Mandela are equal in the eyes of God. Proponents of stem cell research like to emphasize that it doesn't cost the life of a single embryo. The embryos killed to extract their stem cells were doomed already. But this argument gives too much ground, and misses the point. If embryos are human beings, it's not okay to kill them for their stem cells just because you were going to kill them, or knowingly let them die, anyway. The better point -- the killer point, if you'll pardon the expression -- is that if embryos are human beings, the routine practices of fertility clinics are far worse -- both in numbers and in criminal intent -- than stem cell research. And yet, no one objects, or objects very loudly. President Bush actually praised the work of fertility clinics in his first speech announcing restrictions on stem cells. Even strong believers in abortion rights (I'm one) ought to acknowledge and respect the moral sincerity of many right-to-lifers. I cannot share, or even fathom, their conviction that a microscopic dot -- as oblivious as a rock, more primitive than a worm -- has the same human rights as anyone reading this article. I don't have their problem with the question of when human life begins. (When did "human" life begin during evolution? Obviously, there is no magic point. But that doesn't prevent us from claiming humanity for ourselves and denying it to the embryo-like entities we evolved from.) Nevertheless, abortion opponents deserve respect for more than just their right to hold and express an opinion we disagree with. Excluding, of course, the small minority who believe that their righteousness puts them above the law, sincere right-to-lifers deserve respect as that rarity in modern American politics: a strong interest group defending the interest of someone other than themselves. Or so I always thought -- until the arrival of stem cells. Moral sincerity is not impressive if it depends on willful ignorance and indifference to logic. Not every opponent of stem cell research deserves to have his or her debater's license taken away. There are a few, no doubt, who are as horrified by fertility clinics as they are by stem cell research, and a subset of this subset may even be doing something about it. But these people, if they exist, are not a political force strong enough to stop a juggernaut of medical progress that so many other people are desperate to encourage. The vast majority of people who oppose stem cell research either haven't thought it through, or have thought it through and don't care. I wish they would think again.
© 2006 The Washington Post Company
|
127 |
HHS Issues Citizenship
Guidelines For Medicaid Eligibility
HHS issued guidelines for states to implement a new requirement, effective July 1, that persons applying for Medicaid document their citizenship. The new documentation requirement is mandated by Section 6036 of the Deficit Reduction Act of 2005 (DRA) and is intended to ensure that Medicaid beneficiaries are citizens without imposing undue burdens on them or the states. Today's guidance letter to state Medicaid officials will be followed by federal regulations that will appear in the Federal Register. Recognizing the diversity of beneficiaries served by Medicaid, the guidelines provide for a range of ways that citizenship status and personal identity may be documented. If other forms of documentation cannot be obtained, documentation may be provided by a written affidavit, signed under penalty of perjury, from two citizens, one of whom cannot be related to the applicant or recipient, who have specific knowledge of a beneficiary's citizenship status. Affidavits can only be used in rare circumstances. Additional types of documentation, such as school records, may be used for children. Current beneficiaries should not lose benefits during the period in which they are undertaking a good-faith effort to provide documentation to the state. American citizenship or legal immigration status has always been a requirement for Medicaid eligibility; however, beneficiaries could assert their citizenship status by checking a box on a form. The DRA requires actual documentary evidence before Medicaid eligibility is granted or renewed beginning July 1. The provision requires that a person provide both evidence of citizenship and identity. In many cases, a single document will be enough to establish both citizenship and identity such as a passport. However, if secondary documentation is used, such as a birth certificate, the individual will also need evidence of their identity. Once citizenship has been proven, it need not be documented again with each eligibility renewal unless later evidence raises a question. A copy of the State Medicaid Director letter and a Fact Sheet are attached on the AAPD website at www.aapd.com/News/deficit/060612cms.htm. or, go to the CMS website: www.cms.hhs.gov/MedicaidEligibility/05_ProofofCitizenship.asp
|
128 |
FDA Clears Once-a-Day AIDS Drug Single-Pill Regimen Hailed as Milestone
By Marc
Kaufman The world's first single-pill, once-a-day AIDS treatment was approved yesterday by the Food and Drug Administration -- a medication that experts say will make it easier for infected people to keep the virus under control. Developed in an unusual cooperative venture by the makers of two rival drugs, the new combination pill, called Atripla, marks a milestone in the treatment of AIDS. While patients used to take 10 or more pills a day, they will now be able to control their disease with one medication. "This is a landmark for those suffering with HIV and AIDS," said acting FDA Commissioner Andrew von Eschenbach. People will be more likely to take a single pill consistently than several of them, he said, and "compliance with therapy is as important as the therapy itself for a successful outcome." Deputy FDA Commissioner Murray Lumpkin, who runs the agency's international and special programs, called approval of Atripla a major achievement. "A single, fixed-dose pill has long been seen as the holy grail of AIDS treatment," he said. The combination pill will not only keep patients healthier, officials said, but also help slow the development of community-wide resistance to AIDS drugs. If patients do not take the drugs regularly, the human immunodeficiency virus has a better chance of mutating into new forms of AIDS that are not affected by the available medications, first in individual patients and later in others. At a news conference yesterday, unusual in announcing a new drug approval, the agency officials said the combination pill will first be available in the United States, but the need is greatest in poor nations where AIDS treatment is often unavailable or inadequate. The sometimes confusing directions involved with taking many pills a day -- some on a full stomach and some on an empty one -- has kept effectiveness rates low. "We know that an HIV-AIDS patient needs to take 95 percent of his or her pills or they won't work," said John C. Martin, chief executive of Gilead Sciences Inc., one of the companies in the Atripla project. "So the fewer pills a patient needs to take, the better the outcome." Martin said creating the combination pill was difficult, with five failed formulations before the successful one was created. "This is not simply a matter of putting together the three drugs," he said. "They have to be put together in a way that each reacts as it does when it's alone, and that can get complicated." The new drug will combine the two most prescribed AIDS medications -- Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.'s Sustiva and Gilead's Truvada, which is itself a two-drug combination. Gilead officials said Atripla will cost about $1,100 a month, which is equal to the current cost of taking Sustiva and Truvada. The drug's price in poor nations hit hard by AIDS will be set by Merck and Co., which markets Sustiva under the name Stocrin in developing countries. Gilead spokesman James Loduca said the company will produce a salmon-colored pill for U.S. distribution and a white pill for sale abroad -- suggesting they will be priced quite differently. The drug will be manufactured in Canada. Von Eschenbach said the FDA wants to encourage other companies to join forces in developing new drugs. The computer industry learned long ago to cooperate in creating new products, he said, and drugmakers are just beginning to move to that model. The pharmaceutical industry has been under substantial pressure to simplify AIDS-treatment regimens in particular, and companies have been combining medicines for several years. But until the joint venture that created Atripla was formed, a once-a-day pill proved elusive -- for reasons more commercial than scientific. The FDA said Atripla will be considered for use in 15 developing countries, many of them in Africa, under President Bush's 2003 initiative to combat AIDS. The five-year, $15 billion program aims to treat at least 2 million infected people. Many of the AIDS drugs used in the program have patent protection but are made in generic versions by companies abroad -- for sale exclusively in poor nations -- with the approval of the patent-holding company. Several Indian companies in particular are active now in making AIDS drugs, including three-drug combinations, but none has yet produced a once-a-day pill. There are as many as 40 million people worldwide with HIV or AIDS, and more than a million in the United States. About 40,000 new U.S. cases are reported annually. The FDA has approved 28 products in the United States to treat HIV infection -- most of them as high-priority applications. The Atripla application was approved after a review of only three months, but FDA officials said the agency worked with the manufacturers for several years before the application was submitted. FDA approved Sustiva in 1998 and the two Gilead drugs -- Viread and Emtriva -- in 2001 and 2003. Their safety and effectiveness in combination were established in a 48-week clinical study with 244 infected adults. In that trial, 80 percent of the people experienced a significant reduction in their virus levels and a substantial increase in the number of healthy cells that fight against infection. Combination drugs -- or drug "cocktails" -- are especially useful in treating HIV and AIDS because, used regularly, they can keep the fast-evolving virus from mutating into new, hard-to-treat variations. While Atripla will reduce the number of anti-retroviral pills a patient needs to take, officials said, additional medications to boost the immune system and protect against other infections will often be needed.
|
129 |
As I was wheeling up B'way (on the east side) between
178th -179th Sts
(across from the Geo Wash Bridge), I stopped and wheeled back! All I could think was WOW! I wheeled past here 2 nights ago but didn't notice it...when did it appear? I asked the bus dispatcher who said this was his first day here. I asked a Bx3 driver, who said he'd never seen it before but really liked it. There it was.....in the Bx 3 stop (lay-over) a yellow triangle for the bus to stop the front of the bus and lining up at the back door was a stenciled big yellow box with a wheelchair symbol painted inside! It was so great! I've never seen this before, has anyone else? EM Prentiss __._,_.___ Help build the Network in 2006-2007, and increase civic participation of people with disabilities in NYC. Get your friends and associates involved. Visit www.dnnyc.net for more info, to join or renew membership, or call 212-251-4071 (Alexander Wood) or 212-251-4092 (Lawrence Carter-Long). You are receiving Individual Emails Change Delivery Settings Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
New Message Search
Find the message you want faster. Visit your group to try out the improved message search.
SPONSORED LINKS
.
|
Page |
10/27/2006 mjg Ó2003 carmelo gonzalez webmaster@carmelogonzalez.com www.CarmeloGonzalez.com
Last updated on 07/19/2008